Thomas Mollett’s Forensic Report on Shan’ann Watts’ Post Mortem Blood Alcohol Level

Immediately following the release of the autopsy reports on November 19th, I contacted Thomas Mollett, a forensic investigator, fellow true crime author and friend, and asked him his opinion on Shan’anns Blood Alcohol Levels. They were found to be three times the legal limit for driving. How likely was it, I asked, that these apparently high levels were from “normal” decomposition?

SUPPLEMENTAL

Autopsy reports show Shanann Watts, daughters were asphyxiated – TimesCall

Fullscreen capture 20181217 233710

Pathology is an extremely complex science, and many factors play into the biological processes that occur after death.

image001

The three basic pillars one uses to calculate whether the BAC is “normal” or not are related to:

  1. the time the body is exposed to the elements [here time of death is a factor, unknown in this case, but with a relatively short window either way]
  2. the ambient conditions of the body [temperature, humidity etc.]
  3. circumstantial evidence is also a vital tool to gauge alcohol content, including eye witnesses, Shan’ann’s drinking habits, and her appearance in the Ring camera footage when she arrived home [described but not released thus far]

During our first communication I miscommunicated to Mollett that Shan’ann’s corpse was recovered after only 48 hours, which I guessed wasn’t enough time to reflect the high alcohol levels found. This was an initial error on my part; it took closer to 70 hours for Shan’ann’s corpse to be discovered and exhumed.

Based on this initial miscommunication, Mollett also believed the BAC level was likely higher than a natural rate [which as I say, was also what I suspected].

I asked Mollett to investigate the BAC levels and I’m grateful to him for doing so in detail. Obviously part of his thorough investigation corrected the original 48 hour error.

Below is Mollet’s unabridged report on the BAC levels.

Fullscreen capture 20181217 230915Fullscreen capture 20181217 230922Fullscreen capture 20181217 230928Fullscreen capture 20181217 230933Fullscreen capture 20181217 230940Fullscreen capture 20181217 231003Fullscreen capture 20181217 231009Fullscreen capture 20181217 231013Fullscreen capture 20181217 231022Fullscreen capture 20181217 231028

Fullscreen capture 20181217 235348Fullscreen capture 20181217 235321Fullscreen capture 20181217 231033Fullscreen capture 20181217 231105

20181119__20TCAAUTw_1

8 Inches – The Width of the Thief Hatches in Pictures

The thief hatches are small, about the same size at the white hard hat of the man on the right, exiting the gangway. When one zooms to directly above the hatches, the perspective shifts and you can see just how small they are. Bear in mind, the opening inside tapers, which means the silver dome is wider than the opening underneath. In fact the exterior of the hatch – at 15.5 inches – is virtually twice as wide as the opening underneath.

Fullscreen capture 20181203 100708Fullscreen capture 20181203 100723Fullscreen capture 20181203 100734Fullscreen capture 20181203 102340-001

JT81040 New Lid June 2015JT20.1 openJT20.1 a look insidevcrdefullscreen-capture-20180915-101246fullscreen-capture-20180915-101246-001Enardo-ES-665-Blog-Image-3Fullscreen capture 20180911 144456Fullscreen capture 20180911 144510Fullscreen capture 20180916 104145Fullscreen capture 20181103 012551Fullscreen capture 20181103 012024