Netflix Documentary claims: “3-Year-Old Madeleine McCann was abducted by Sex Traffickers/Pedophiles”

I’m thrilled that the producers of this film have decided to shine a massive magnifying glass on the popular theory that 1) Madeleine McCann is still alive 12 years after her “abduction” and 2) that the toddler was abducted by sex traffickers/pedophiles.

For some time I’ve felt this theory deserves a really good airing in the mainstream, and for folks who believe it to put up their hands, wave their flag of allegiance so we can see it, and make their voices heard.

It should be noted in Kate McCann’s book she makes the case for some sort of pedophile assault on her three-year-old child:

Fullscreen capture 20190315 004646

‘I can forgive Maddie’s abductor’: Six years on Kate McCann says she does not want to be eaten up by ‘hatred and bitterness’ – Daily Mail

Maddie snatcher ‘forgiven’: MADELEINE McCann’s mum has forgiven the beast who snatched her little girl during a family holiday in Portugal six years ago. – Daily Star

Madeleine McCann News: ‘I Could Probably Forgive Her Abductor’ Says Mother Kate – Huffpost

To date I’ve written a trilogy on the McCann case dealing with why Madeleine is certainly dead, how and why she died, and how and where her body was initially hidden before being finally disposed of.

In the DOUBT trilogy I didn’t want to contaminate the original hypothesis with conspiracy theories, of which there are many, just as there are in the JonBenet Ramsey case.

15578759_1346094118765724_6851561404489732785_n

Just as in the JonBenet Ramsey case, the pedophile scenario invokes some sick, shadowy outsider breaking into the family home [despite the risk of others being home], and then abducts the child etc but forgets to leave any evidence of himself. No footprints, no fingerprints, no fibers, no DNA, no witnesses seeing him breaking and entering, or exiting. Zero. Zip. Nada. Oh but he exists.

In the Ramsey case the pedophile intruder breaks into the home to have sex with his victim, kidnaps her from her bed, bludgeons and strangles the little girl, but then forgets to have sex with her and escapes through a window and levitates over snow without waking anyone up. If no one heard or saw him, if his abduction was successful for all intents and purposes, why did he abandon the victim that he risked it all for before doing what he’d come to do?

Instead of removing his clothes and performing sexual acts, as is his nature, in the Ramsey case the strange pedophile attacker apparently elects to sit down to write a three-page Ransom Note [which takes roughly 20 minutes] using materials inside the house. This is what he chooses to do with his alone time with the victim. For a dude meticulous enough not to leave any trace of himself, not even a single fingerprint on the three-page note, leaving the note is a huge mismatch to the surrounding parapsychology.

Yet as absurd as that theory was, District Attorney Mary Lacy bought into it hook, line and sinker, and more than 20 years later, the mainstream media is still hopping from one pedophile suspect to the next in an endless game of “find the pedophile”.

Who does this benefit? Clearly it benefits someone.

Pedophile Confesses to Killing JonBenet Ramsey in Letters to Friend – Rolling Stone [January, 2019]

I killed JonBenét Ramsey!’ Convicted pedophile Gary Oliva has confessed to the murder of six-year-old pageant princess in prison letters to his friend – claiming it was ‘an accident’ – MSN [January, 2019]

Although Gary Oliva has suddenly been receiving a lot of press again in 2019, immediately following the recent settlement of the $750 million lawsuit between Burke Ramsey’s lawyer and CBS, he’s hardly a new suspect.

As early as 2002 Oliva was identified, investigated and apparently cleared as a suspect by the cops in Boulder. Of course, confirming Oliva as an official suspect or not is quite complicated. The information is there, it’s just muddy and muddled, that’s all.

From Daily Camera:

In the 2002 jailhouse interview that was part of the “48 Hours Investigates” broadcast, Oliva denied hurting or killing JonBenet. He also said he had never used a stun gun on a child. But Oliva did admit to an obsession with the Ramseys’ youngest child. “I believe she came to me after she was killed and revealed herself to me,” he said. “I’d like to see a memorial set up for her. I haven’t seen that, anywhere.”

In an interview with the Daily Camera after the 2002 CBS broadcast, then-Boulder Police chief Mark Beckner said Oliva remained a suspect in the Ramsey case.

Interestingly, although Oliva is making the headlines now, the cops gave no credence to Oliva in October 2002. 

In fact CBS reported:

Smit is convinced that a pedophile came into the Ramsey home and killed their daughter. “I’ve probably got 25 good leads. And I probably have another 50 pages of other leads to follow,” he says.

Among the files he’s keeping on sex offenders in Boulder, Gary Oliva’s name stands out. Police said that in 1991, months after he sexually assaulted the little girl, Oliva tried to strangle his mother with a telephone cord. And in December 1996, Oliva, then a fugitive and a homeless drifter, may have been less than a block away from the Ramsey’s house.

Why aren’t the Boulder police taking these leads more seriously? Police have dismissed Oliva because his DNA doesn’t match evidence at the scene. The Ramseys say police have a double standard: While some suspects have been cleared because their DNA doesn’t match, they have not been cleared for the same reason.

Just this week, police said Oliva is not a suspect. Sources say his DNA doesn’t match evidence at the scene.

Now we’re seeing a similar narrative play out in the McCann case, except the pedophile abduction theory isn’t new here either. The #1 suspect originally on the sex trafficking conspiracy radar appeared to be one Robert Murat – basically the McCann version of Gary Oliva – except Murat’s a lot more of an upstanding citizen. Unlike Oliva, Murat had no criminal record and no convictions at the time he was falsely fingered as a suspect.

robert-murat-right-wife-michaela-walczuch-leave-faro-police-station-after-police-interview

In fact if anything, Murat participated in the investigation as a volunteer translator, far more than can be said about the McCanns who were [like the Ramseys] less than co-operative with the local authorities, to put it mildly. In fact on the evening Madeleine vanished, the only people not looking for the little girl were Kate and Gerry.

The false “tip-offs”, meanwhile, started as early as May 2007, the same month as Madeleine’s disappearance. One of those tip-offs came from the Tapas 7 [the McCanns’ pals] who mistakenly identified Tannerman as key abductor suspect. Even though Tannerman had played tennis with Gerry, and came forward to say “hey, it was me” it took six years for him to be officially cleared.

Murat formed an important part of the false tip-offs extravaganza during the crucial first days of the investigation.

False tip-offs hamper hunt for Madeleine – The Guardian

Fullscreen capture 20190315 013456

As such, Murat successfully sued several newspapers for defamation for printing slurs about him as early as one year after Madeleine’s “abduction”. At the time, Murat won a record settlement of 600 000 pounds.

Fullscreen capture 20190314 231550

But because Murat lived quite close to the crime scene [like Oliva], he remained a sort of  default choice as prime suspect, aside from the original prime suspects of course. As long as the crime remained unsolved, suspicions hung like a cloud over Murat.

aerialmw

Fullscreen capture 20190314 234601

Fullscreen capture 20190314 234700

Based on the Netflix trailer, it seems Murat will be mentioned as part of the pedophile narrative not so much implicating him, but implicating 1) the pedophile conspiracy narrative and thus giving it some substance and 2) accusing the authorities [presumably the Portuguese cops] of an improper investigation, thus undermining their allegations [including those identifying the parents as arguidos/suspects].

I have made passing remarks in my three narratives to debunk the pedophile/abductor theory, starting with the obvious. If a stranger abductor wants to steal a child, the easiest way to do that is in a public area like a beach or a park. What an abductor won’t do nine times out of ten is break into a locked or secure home, grab the child [leaving traces of himself], and then break out again, all with the threat of being caught in flagrante delicto.

But more important than imputing the typical profile of a stranger abductor, is looking at the behavior of the parents following the abduction. In the Ramseys’ case, following the murder of their daughter by a random kidnapping pedophile, what did they do – they sent their other child to another nearby residence and never seemed particularly concerned for Burke’s safety. By January 1997, within a month of his sister’s murder, Burke was back at school and his father back at work, back to business as usual.

He continued going to the same school, and security protocols at the school were casual, to put it mildly. Not the sort of thing a parent convinced their child was attacked by a neighborhood monster still-at-large would do, and of course, Burke Ramsey himself wasn’t in the least bit frightened either. No nightmares. Not much concern that his sister had been killed in the basement. In fact when Burke was asked why he wasn’t at school during those first weeks, it wasn’t to hide away from an attacker, but the press.

Fullscreen capture 20190315 012205

Fullscreen capture 20190315 011834

Fullscreen capture 20190315 024341Fullscreen capture 20190315 024344

In the McCann case, it’s not often reported that the McCanns continued to stay in the Ocean Club hotel for an additional two months following the “abduction”. Besides that, their other two children continued to be dropped off at the Ocean Club creche [Kids Club] as per normal, immediately following the abduction.

When the McCanns left to see the Pope in May 2007 [less than a month after Madeleine’s “disappearance”, they left both their children behind in the pedophile paradise of Praia da Luz before continuing a whirlwind tour of Europe.

From BBC:

They have left their two-year-old twins in the Algarve with Mr McCann’s sister, Trish Cameron, and her husband Sandy, deciding they were too young to take on the trip to Italy. The couple are also due to visit Spain, the Netherlands, Morocco and Germany to raise awareness of their daughter’s disappearance.

In fact the pictures the tabloid media were able to get of the couple in the weeks  following the abduction were all at the same resort where Madeleine was “abducted”. All the pictures of the McCanns in the aftermath were taken as they went to drop off their other children at the creche first thing in the morning, so that they could concentrate on attending to the PR surrounding Madeleine.

amelie-mccann-missing-british-3-year-old-girl-madeleine-mccann-in-portugal-0FMvXv

But that’s not the most ridiculous aspect of this conspiracy. That is reserved for the idea that all evidence to the contrary, Madeleine is still alive. With zero confirmed evidence of Madeleine being sighted in twelve years, Madeleine still being alive is based on less evidence than that she isn’t.

Based on cadaver traces alone [in apartment 5a, in the garden below the apartment, in the villa, on Madeleine’s cuddlecat toy, and inside the rental vehicle’s trunk] it’s clear someone died. If it wasn’t Madeleine, was it someone else [in the apartment, in the rental car, in the villa…]?

Fullscreen capture 20190315 001426Fullscreen capture 20190315 001507Fullscreen capture 20190315 001509Fullscreen capture 20190315 001512Fullscreen capture 20190315 001518Fullscreen capture 20190315 001522Fullscreen capture 20190315 001529Fullscreen capture 20190315 001556Fullscreen capture 20190315 001558Fullscreen capture 20190315 001602Fullscreen capture 20190315 001606Fullscreen capture 20190315 001613Fullscreen capture 20190315 001619Fullscreen capture 20190315 001623Fullscreen capture 20190315 001628Fullscreen capture 20190315 001631Fullscreen capture 20190315 001635Fullscreen capture 20190315 001637Fullscreen capture 20190315 001640Fullscreen capture 20190315 001643Fullscreen capture 20190315 001646Fullscreen capture 20190315 001648Fullscreen capture 20190315 001651Fullscreen capture 20190315 001659Fullscreen capture 20190315 001704Fullscreen capture 20190315 001710Fullscreen capture 20190315 001718Fullscreen capture 20190315 001723Fullscreen capture 20190315 001729Fullscreen capture 20190315 001737Fullscreen capture 20190315 001739

McCann team tests car for traces of Madeleine – Telegraph [2007]

Witness Statement of Alexander James CAMERON – PJFiles [2008]

Gerry and Kate’s reaction to sniffer dogs hitting on McCann holiday apartment and rental car ‘didn’t make sense’ – 9News

Detectives ask: Where did the car go? – Daily Star [September 16, 2007]

Michael Wright Rogatory Interview – 16th April 2008

Fullscreen capture 20190315 001747Fullscreen capture 20190315 001749Fullscreen capture 20190315 001753Fullscreen capture 20190315 001802Fullscreen capture 20190315 001805Fullscreen capture 20190315 001813Fullscreen capture 20190315 001818Fullscreen capture 20190315 001821Fullscreen capture 20190315 001824Fullscreen capture 20190315 001827Fullscreen capture 20190315 001835Fullscreen capture 20190315 001839Fullscreen capture 20190315 001845

It’s this narrative that Madeleine is still alive that’s the reason I believe this documentary actually has the tacit support of the McCanns despite appearances to the contrary. The fact that the documentary is coming out a month before the 12th anniversary of her disappearance isn’t an accident. It’s been carefully planned and executed. So much of this case is about precisely that – appearances and PR. And after losing their latest lawsuit, the McCanns need some fresh impetus to their bogus “there is always hope” spiel.

Fullscreen capture 20190314 232534

From News24:

Top British police officer Jim Gamble claims that they’ll find Maddie within his lifetime, according to Daily Mail reports.

There’s huge hope to be had with the advances in technology. Year on year DNA is getting better,” Gamble has said, “Year on year other techniques, including facial recognition, are getting better. “And as we use that technology to revisit and review that which we captured in the past, there’s every likelihood that something we already know will slip into position.”

It’s been suggested that Maddie is still alive and was taken by human traffickers because of her financial value as a “middle-class British girl”, Metro reports. The long-awaited documentary is expected to be released on Friday, despite opposition from Madeleine’s family.

Her parents, Kate and Gerry McCann, have repeatedly refused to take part in the show, according to The Guardian. They’ve also reportedly urged others to refuse doing interviews with production house Pulse Films, who’s making the series.

‘There will always be hope’: Madeleine McCann’s parents refuse to give up hope in nine-year search – Evening Standard

Kate and Gerry McCann thank supporters and say they will never give up hope in the search for their daughter 12 years after she vanished – Daily Mail

Madeleine McCann still alive – and could be minutes from where she disappeared, claims ex-detective – Belfast Telegraph

New Netflix documentary claims that Maddie McCann is alive– news.com.au

 

4 thoughts on “Netflix Documentary claims: “3-Year-Old Madeleine McCann was abducted by Sex Traffickers/Pedophiles”

  1. If I were John and Burke, Kate and Gerry, I would be absolutely worn out with the effort it takes to cover up the truth for the rest of my life. But in the moment they had the opportunity to say okay, we were irresponsible and neglectful or vicious and selfish but no – I think we’ll fabricate a story or tamper with our dead child’s body and go with a lie for the rest of our lives. That’s preferable to whatever jail time or scandal that will cause us.

    Liked by 2 people

  2. The divorce rate is very high after the natural death of a child, even higher when they’ve been taken violently. But it seems parents that are suspected of killing their children or charged even years after the child went missing or died are still together. A secret like that seems to bond them together

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.