Chris Watts: Are Expert Psychologists Qualified to Prognosticate on Criminal Psychology?

At 2.11 in the clip, two expert psychologists from Colorado are shown a clip of Chris Watts sobbing into his hands with his father’s arm over his shoulder, and the two agents [both with their hands against their chins] looking on silently off his opposite shoulder.

The assessment of the psychologist is triumphant:

“It’s up! [Smiles]. He’s caught. Now he’s upset. Because he’s caught.This is the first time you see emotion…Because now he’s caught. You didn’t see emotion when his family was killed, you see emotion now that he’s caught…”

At the time Watts was “confessing” to Shan’ann murdering the kids [in the house] and himself reacting to this in a mindless rage. Are the agents in the room also thinking:

It’s up! He’s caught. Now he’s upset. Because he’s caught. 

Fullscreen capture 20190415 114540

If the agents were thinking that, why go back and interview him a second time for almost five hours?

And clip goes on to say “why?” will likely never be answered. With that attitude, why even bring in psychologists? The “we’ll never know why” cop out is kindergarten true crime analysis. The assessment that a criminal is “evil” is schoolyard level criminal analysis.

It’s hardly a case of never. It’s more a case of applying one’s mind on a particular for weeks, months or longer on end. Put some effort in. Study the case. Think about the case. When one does that the why becomes clearer, if not entirely obvious.

Fullscreen capture 20190415 115616

There’s also a postscript calling Watts a “master manipulator”. Yes, the guy you saw swaying next to the television and not fooling anyone there, apparently did fool someone.

chris-watts-via-weld-county-district-attorneys-office6954440-6455827-image-m-5_1543858159762Fullscreen capture 20190415 1206083zclq65al5effas5p2iecosdei

I discuss and analyze the psychology of Chris and Shan’ann Watts in detail in the TWO FACE series, as this latest review of Book #7 illustrates:

Fullscreen capture 20190416 130302

16 thoughts on “Chris Watts: Are Expert Psychologists Qualified to Prognosticate on Criminal Psychology?

  1. Most family annihilators kill their entire families and themselves and clearly CW did not do that but I think his guilt and Bella’s last words will kill him. Clearly CW is not a family annihilator. Clearly CW did not kill them to end suffering, debt or the likes. CW, much like Susan Smith, killed them so he could move on with his life by himself and possibly with a love interest. If you truly study CW and this case there is a missing link in the puzzle.

    Like

    • If CW could effectively “disappear” them, he could immediately withdraw the girls from the too-expensive-and-unnecessary daycare/”preschool” and stop spending $5,000/month on that nothing. That’s one of the first things CW did after disposing of his victims.

      If CW could effectively “disappear” them, he could put that albatross of a house on the market and sell it for a fat profit. That’s another of the first things CW did after disposing of his victims.

      See a pattern developing? Just maybe?

      Like

  2. Chris Watts is a family ahhnilator and he was emotional in that video
    only because he was caught (more likely than not.) I didn’t need to see the psychologists to confirm this notion to figure that out.
    I’ve watched, studied, everything on this case from day one.
    This case isn’t over. There is more investigation going on.
    Yes, I think criminal psychologists are qualified to prognosticate on criminal psychology.

    Like

      • Nick, one of the fatal missteps Chris made was not being aware of how *vigilant* women tend to be, given the risks to them posed by men. Take a look at this paragraph, from the excellent article, “Schrödinger’s Rapist: or a guy’s guide to approaching strange women without being maced”:

        >>Is preventing violent assault or murder part of your daily routine, rather than merely something you do when you venture into war zones? Because, for women, it is. When I go on a date, I always leave the man’s full name and contact information written next to my computer monitor. This is so the cops can find my body if I go missing. My best friend will call or e-mail me the next morning, and I must answer that call or e-mail before noon-ish, or she begins to worry. If she doesn’t hear from me by three or so, she’ll call the police. My activities after dark are curtailed. Unless I am in a densely-occupied, well-lit space, I won’t go out alone. Even then, I prefer to have a friend or two, or my dogs, with me. Do you follow rules like these?<<

        This is about the risks to women posed by men, who may or may not be rapists and/or murderers – it's impossible to tell by looking at someone. But women frequently have these "have each other's back" networks where they watch out for each other – it's likely something that Chris was unaware of, so he couldn't really have planned for it appropriately. Because this "watching out for each other" is so much a part of female socialization, he could have predicted that NUA would have expected to have contact with Shan'Ann, and then become alarmed if she couldn't reach her.

        Then again, if he *had* been aware and part of his plan had been to use Shan'Ann's phone to send texts so no one got immediately suspicious, that part of the plan would have been thwarted by the changed password, and by the time he realized that, he was too far from the home computer to use that to send the necessary messages…

        Like

        • It makes me wonder what impact him being high on Thrive – and possibly sleep deprived – had on addling his mind. Shan’ann publishing the picture of the doll in the sheet on Instagram ought to have given any premeditated murderer pause. The flight delay as well, although if he’d already murdered the children, then he heard about the flight delay after that, too late…

          Like

      • I totally agree with you Nick. Those tears did not represent getting caught. He took the bait from the detective who suggested that maybe Shanann had done something to cause him to kill her. He knew he didn’t pass the polygraph, so he had to go the route of perhaps getting a lesser charge. His tears were being used as a prop in achieving this.

        Another problem I had with these psychologists, (whom I too thought were bringing nothing to the table), were the comments that were made concerning true crime “obsessed” people. How it’s dangerous to study the case too much because it will cause paranoia. Seriously?

        Like

          • That was certainly the case in grad school. But those kids were trying for an MFCC license – marriage and family counseling therapists. Some had demons they were dealing with. One student I remember really had a gift. He was bright and very intuitive and I hope he went all the way through. If you can make it through the course curriculum, do the 3000 hours of practicum, and pass the licensing test you should be ready. But by and large I found phD’s in Clinical to be far more qualified than MFCC therapists. Because more is required, the program is longer, and Psychiatry is an option with a medical license. Therapists are a dime a dozen. Not to say that there aren’t very good therapists out there.

            Like

    • The problem I see with the “expert” opinions from psychology professionals is they tend to go for the low hanging fruit and grab at oversimplified descriptions of the psychology surrounding criminal behaviors or their reactions after the fact. I think they often fail to look at the larger picture. One good example is what Ralph refers to from “Schrodinger’s Rapist” that are inherent of women’s relationships with one another.

      We know Chris Watts was easily influenced by the individuals/groups he was spending the most time with – the psychology of the group think at Anadarko (as with Thrive) should enter into consideration as well. This article describes a deeply embedded culture of misogyny and objectification in Chris Watts’ workplace. Something worth considering, I believe – the oil industry and Thrive make this particular family annihilation quite unique to examine.

      https://jezebel.com/former-employee-alleged-oil-company-has-culture-of-trea-1834083525

      Like

      • I’m glad you brought that up JC. It was what I was thinking earlier – the psychology of group think at Anadarko. Good thinking again JC. Watts was told by Luke Epple that he needed to stay away from work until he had his head on straight (not those words), but at least until it got resolved where his wife and children had gone to. Epple then goes on to explain the family work philosophy at Anadarko, that they deal with hazardous materials and if anyone’s head isn’t in the game other workers could be affected. He also stressed to Watts that family comes first. Watts had already told Epple that he may be parking his work truck somewhere else as he and his wife were having problems. He put Epple on alert, but what else could he do – walk to Nichole’s? So Watts was walking a fine line. He sure as hell didn’t want to lose his job, if he lost his job he would lose Nichole wouldn’t he?

        Like

  3. Agent Lee mentioned the first time around that Chris didn’t seem to exhibit the usual emotions one would associate with having your children and wife go missing. It was soon after that that he uttered a “sniffing” sound. So when the agents go back for round 2 Watts is making sure he chokes up and sniffles. We can’t see his face, so we don’t know if he spilled any tears but I do not think he is emotional even now. And he hasn’t come to grips with what he did yet. And he may never. Scott Peterson was a much better actor. But the trained eye can see through Peterson too. He let those tears stream down his face and stay there so as to be seen worldwide and interpreted as grief. A poor salesman, an amateur actor, but better than Watts.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.