TRUE CRIME ROCKET SCIENCE

True Crime Analysis, Breakthroughs, Insights & Discussions Hosted by Bestselling Author Nick van der Leek

Tag: Nickole Atkinson (Page 2 of 3)

Chris Watts: The Devil in Disguise + Miscellaneous Videos [UPDATED]

December 8, 2018 / / 4 Comments

The moment Chris Watts confessed to murdering his pregnant wife: Part 2 – Yahoo

Chris Watts led double life before murdering his family, court docs show: Part 3 – Yahoo

In a shocking statement, Chris Watts describes how he killed his wife: Part 4 – Yahoo

https://youtu.be/lj_SsI6AW2g

https://youtu.be/G5xHGwXD3_8

The title to the video below is incorrect and misleading. Although Watts did defecate beside tanks, it wasn’t at CERVI 319 but CERVI 1029.

https://youtu.be/uBVgs4y-o0U

https://youtu.be/WJmp7xy8sTQ

https://youtu.be/uhYUig7P-68

https://youtu.be/Hd2Nb1pY5Q4

https://youtu.be/t6zmxuZdBc8

https://youtu.be/tnuex9vE6VQ

https://youtu.be/5W11KJ_fK4E

https://youtu.be/3VH-yajT1JA

https://youtu.be/tmdfsYiVMLo

https://youtu.be/fTQ6l9B741o

 

Excellent Footage of the Moment Officer Coonrod Arrives on the Scene at 2825 Saratoga Trail

December 5, 2018 / / 13 Comments

This footage confirms something that’s been frustratingly difficult to establish for sure. It may seem like a silly detail, but I wanted to know where Deeter was and why no one heard him when Nickole Atkinson came knocking.

Thanks to this footage, that mystery has been solved. Deeter was in the basement, which from the neighbor’s perspective, was virtually soundproof. From someone standing at the front door, you can just barely hear the dog barking when Officer Coonrod shouts Shan’ann’s name [see second Instagram clip below].

What this also shows is the lack of detail and holes in perception even when there are three different people on the scene. None of them made note of the dog because they didn’t think it was important. But locking Deeter in the basement should have been the first sign that Shan’ann wasn’t at a friend’s house. She wouldn’t have left the dog there when she went out, she’d have let him outside in the back garden [most likely]. Or, if she left the house, the dog would have free run of the main level, assuming the motion detectors were turned off or tuned to ignore doggy-sized disturbances.

The other aspect is leaving Deeter in an almost soundproof basement shows a) that Watts didn’t want the dog attracting the attention of nosy neighbors [remember, after the murders he was completely on his own for almost nine hours, from 05:00 to 14:00, and if everything had gone according to plan, Watts would only have arrived home at 17:00 or 18:00. 13 hours is a long time for a dog to be left on its own, especially for a dachshund. It also shows b) Watts’ postmeditation. How he “took care of the dog” demonstrates the amount of meticulous thinking [only some of which we’re aware of thus far] that went into the premeditation.

Fullscreen capture 20181205 064826Fullscreen capture 20181204 171117Fullscreen capture 20181204 223628Fullscreen capture 20181204 223723Fullscreen capture 20181205 064707

Notice this outside porch light [below] was left on; unless it’s motion activated, it may be further sign of Watts’ hasty exit earlier that morning.Fullscreen capture 20181205 064717Fullscreen capture 20181205 064956

It’s also worth noting that the neighbor also had a dog, which means if Deeter was barking for a length of time, the neighbor’s dog would start barking “in sympathy”, something Watts would want to avoid.Fullscreen capture 20181205 081724

Even when Coonrod scoots down to peer in the basement, he doesn’t see or hear Deeter. This may be because Deeter was sequestered in the basement stairway, assuming there was a door or barrier of some kind at the bottom as well.

It’s also possible Coonrod simply didn’t see the dog in the darkness and clutter inside. But it’s unlikely the dog didn’t see the officer. If he did, he’d have scampered around and barked at the would-be intruder.

Fullscreen capture 20181205 064452Fullscreen capture 20181205 064519Fullscreen capture 20181205 064836

Final point. Notice how when Watts opens the front door he immediately turns away, towards the wall, and walks quickly to the kitchen. Once Coonrod is in the kitchen he strides quickly to the basement. Coonrod is still trying to get his attention, talk to him and catch up. When Coonrod asks if he can look around, Watts says yes, appears to go somewhere, but then abruptly reappears. Watts had a lot of on-scene cleaning up and picking-up to do that he hadn’t anticipated when he left that morning.

This is another version of what probably happened in the Ramsey home for seven hours while the cops were in the house, and the friends they’d invited into the crime scene, while JonBenet lay dead inside. Crimes aren’t just covered up immediately after they’re committed, when they’re premeditated there is covering up before [removing data from phone and other devices, deactivating Facebook], at the scene with officers present, and Watts was still in clean up mode on the night of August 13th.

fullscreen-capture-20181202-112654.jpg

The Suitcase At the Bottom of the Stairs

December 4, 2018 / / 67 Comments

Shan’ann’s suitcase at the bottom of the stairs wasn’t the same as the suitcases she took to North Carolina.

It was a smaller black case, ideal for a two day trip.

27544947_10155207156011935_6340674235736489707_n

47573406_738402169860208_4265581855610241024_o

Another maddening aspect of the tsunami of coverage is that there are only fleeting glimpses of the suitcase. You’d think the cops would start at that point, the last known point where Shan’ann left a trace of herself from the trip, but instead they’re everywhere else except looking at the case at the bottom of the stairs.

These are some of the glimpses I’ve been able to grab of it thus far.

Fullscreen capture 20181204 201147Fullscreen capture 20181204 201155Fullscreen capture 20181204 201225

Fullscreen capture 20181204 210758

Fullscreen capture 20181206 214945

Fullscreen capture 20181206 221130

My impression was that the suitcase was left right at the foot of the stairs, but this case has been placed to the side of it, which would have taken two or three steps. Furthermore, Watts has left something of his own right beside it, a blue container, on the side of the case. It’s not clear what it is exactly.

While we’re on the subject of the suitcase, this footage provides some perspective of the motion detectors in the lounge. There appear to be just two, one in the corner by the couches, and another set higher up.

Fullscreen capture 20181204 200127

Fullscreen capture 20181204 211153Fullscreen capture 20181204 210940

When one is standing at the foot of the stairs, the small protruding wall blocks the coverage of the upper sensor. Presumably the sensor can detect movement above the first landing on the staircase.Fullscreen capture 20181204 200152Fullscreen capture 20181204 200203Fullscreen capture 20181204 200206

Fullscreen capture 20181204 212655

There’s a strange moment in the footage where the officer asks Watts for information about the doorbell camera. Watts, who has been one great big disappointment in terms of ideas, interest or contributions, suddenly hits his stride. Literally. To explain how well he understands the system, he jogs at the door and shows – demonstrates – to the officer EXACTLY where the range of the doorbell camera extends to.

Fullscreen capture 20181204 200214Fullscreen capture 20181204 200259Fullscreen capture 20181204 210559

There’s also another moment that was of interest to me, and will be of interest to those who have already read the TWO FACE series.  When detective Baumhover and Watts stand below the staircase shooting the breeze, Watts initially appears relaxed, then darts a few glances at his feet and at the floor. If you view the footage carefully, he does this when the detective breaks eye contact and looks away. Nickole Atkinson is also in the room, on his right.

We know Watts’ key tell when he’s nervous is swaying side to side, curling his lower lip and folding his arms. He starts doing that here too.

Fullscreen capture 20181204 202409Fullscreen capture 20181204 202412Fullscreen capture 20181204 202414Fullscreen capture 20181204 202416Fullscreen capture 20181204 202453Fullscreen capture 20181204 202532Fullscreen capture 20181204 202546Fullscreen capture 20181204 202549Fullscreen capture 20181204 202556Fullscreen capture 20181204 202559Fullscreen capture 20181204 202603Fullscreen capture 20181204 202612Fullscreen capture 20181204 202636Fullscreen capture 20181204 202701Fullscreen capture 20181204 202709Fullscreen capture 20181204 202719Fullscreen capture 20181204 202721Fullscreen capture 20181204 202725

When he is initially interrogated, in the kitchen, Watts is standing – from the perspective of the bodycam – between the view of the suitcase [and the stairs]. He’s blocking it, just as he seemed to do in Trinastich’s home when the officer wanted to view the surveillance footage.

Fullscreen capture 20181204 202825Fullscreen capture 20181204 202939Fullscreen capture 20181204 202947Fullscreen capture 20181204 202952Fullscreen capture 20181204 202954Fullscreen capture 20181204 202957Fullscreen capture 20181204 202959Fullscreen capture 20181204 203002Fullscreen capture 20181204 203846Fullscreen capture 20181204 211552Fullscreen capture 20181204 211916Fullscreen capture 20181204 212116Fullscreen capture 20181205 070256Fullscreen capture 20181208 193329Fullscreen capture 20181208 193449

fullscreen-capture-20181204-230738

Fullscreen capture 20181209 190520Fullscreen capture 20181209 183708Fullscreen capture 20181209 191530Fullscreen capture 20181209 191501

Fullscreen capture 20181205 070729

Fullscreen capture 20181206 191600Fullscreen capture 20181206 191607Fullscreen capture 20181206 191613Fullscreen capture 20181206 191615Fullscreen capture 20181206 221610

Fullscreen capture 20181213 161525Fullscreen capture 20181213 161527Fullscreen capture 20181213 161532Fullscreen capture 20181213 161534Fullscreen capture 20181213 161537

I won’t go into the reasons here, but I believe exactly in this area where Watts is standing, Shan’ann was murdered. She never made it up the stairs, and she never got into bed. There was also no argument, in fact no communication between them after she arrived home. The murder was the only message Watts wanted to send.

But what about the Vivint alerts showing no activity on the main level for over two and a half hours? There’s a well known saying in law, and in true crime, absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, or, as I like to put it: the absence of evidence is also evidence.

In the same way Watts was able to hide data on his phone using the Secret Calculator, he knew how to outwit his own home security system. The 01:48 motion alert in the lounge probably came from the overhead sensor, while the one in the corner was neutralized [either digitally turned off, or rendered blind with a piece of paper] until he was finished with his nocturnal work.

Watts was painfully aware of the intricacies of the Vivint system because, while Shan’ann was away, she asked him to repair the dodgy garage sensor.

Fullscreen capture 20181203 073342-001

Part of his dodgy explanation for Shan’ann leaving was that she left through the garage door. His point being, if she’d left that way, he’d have no way of knowing.

Maybe so, but he’d forgotten about the other sensor spying on his garage: Trisnatich’s.

BREAKING: First Crime Scene Footage INSIDE #2825 Saratoga Trail [UPDATED] #TCRS

November 30, 2018 / / 12 Comments

The video below has incredible footage from August 13th at around 14:00, actually capturing Watts returning from CERVI 319 [actually he was at another well in the area, but relatively close to the dumping site], and rushing inside ahead of the cops.

Notice how he runs ahead down the basement while everyone else is on the main floor?

Fullscreen capture 20181201 132217Fullscreen capture 20181201 132253Fullscreen capture 20181201 132255Fullscreen capture 20181201 132219Fullscreen capture 20181201 132258Fullscreen capture 20181201 132226Fullscreen capture 20181201 132306Fullscreen capture 20181201 132308Fullscreen capture 20181201 132311Fullscreen capture 20181201 132314Fullscreen capture 20181201 132343-001

Notice below how Nicolas Atkinson starts eyeballing Watts…

More on Nicolas Atkinson – the Unacknowledged Hero of the Watts Case [36th Tranche]

Fullscreen capture 20181201 132339Fullscreen capture 20181201 132240Fullscreen capture 20181201 133724Fullscreen capture 20181201 132242

Fullscreen capture 20181201 130027Fullscreen capture 20181201 130029

Screengrabs below are from the bodycam worn by an officer on Tuesday, August 14, the day after the murders, and shortly before Watts’ infamous Sermon on the Porch.

Fullscreen capture 20181130 041554Fullscreen capture 20181130 041556Fullscreen capture 20181130 041558

Above: The upstairs loft lounge area where Shan’ann’s phone and iwatch were found beneath two cushions.

 

More: Shan’ann’s Phone Was Left HERE – and what it means

Getting to know the Watts Home as a Crime Scene: #1 Original Floor Plans #2 Upstairs Landing, #3 The Balcony, #4 Revisiting the Windows

Fullscreen capture 20181130 041601

And then detective Baumhover arrives. Notice Nicolas Atkinson doing his own investigation on the side while Watts is distracted talking to the detective.

Fullscreen capture 20181201 144520Fullscreen capture 20181201 144234Fullscreen capture 20181201 144523Fullscreen capture 20181201 144526Fullscreen capture 20181201 144529Fullscreen capture 20181201 144531Fullscreen capture 20181201 144246Fullscreen capture 20181201 144535Fullscreen capture 20181201 144538Fullscreen capture 20181201 144608The basement entrance is here, the door on the right, set back from the stairway, and halfway between the garage entrance and the lounge.

Here Watts appears to be almost jogging up the stairs.Fullscreen capture 20181201 144305-001Fullscreen capture 20181201 144622Fullscreen capture 20181201 144630Fullscreen capture 20181201 144647Fullscreen capture 20181201 144700Fullscreen capture 20181201 144713Fullscreen capture 20181201 144718Fullscreen capture 20181201 144413Fullscreen capture 20181201 144426Fullscreen capture 20181201 144739Fullscreen capture 20181201 144439

Fullscreen capture 20181216 055018Fullscreen capture 20181216 060106

Notice how the open basement door just over Watts left shoulder [right side of image] jutts out, potentially blocking the Vivint motion sensor to its immediate right.

As Watts is questioned here, he repeats the curling in of the upper lip thing, folds his arms and sways while he’s being asked a few questions. He has his head slightly down, like a naughty child not wanting to make eye contact. Even here his demeanor is so completely, it;s not even close. All those Thrive videos had perhaps given Watts the false idea that he could perform in front of the camera if he had to, and that he was a good actor.

Fullscreen capture 20181201 144449Fullscreen capture 20181201 144811Fullscreen capture 20181201 144816Fullscreen capture 20181201 144435

Fullscreen capture 20181213 161606Fullscreen capture 20181213 161609Fullscreen capture 20181213 161614Fullscreen capture 20181213 161626Fullscreen capture 20181213 161629Fullscreen capture 20181213 161652Fullscreen capture 20181213 161708Fullscreen capture 20181213 161726Fullscreen capture 20181213 162335Fullscreen capture 20181213 161539Fullscreen capture 20181213 161542

Fullscreen capture 20181213 175237

Fullscreen capture 20181213 175845Fullscreen capture 20181213 175839Fullscreen capture 20181213 175830Fullscreen capture 20181213 175827Fullscreen capture 20181213 175821Fullscreen capture 20181213 175818Fullscreen capture 20181213 161544Fullscreen capture 20181213 161600Fullscreen capture 20181213 161603

47046117_738063573227401_2835229459664076800_n47300121_738063606560731_1272230159876882432_o47318135_738063563227402_4991781076411088896_o47381885_738402183193540_1587231724314558464_n47390011_738402136526878_2860571965733732352_o47396546_738063536560738_4996903353192546304_o47482273_738065806560511_3912506531374956544_n

Fullscreen capture 20181208 191334Fullscreen capture 20181208 191601Fullscreen capture 20181208 192012Fullscreen capture 20181208 191647Fullscreen capture 20181208 19243947488379_738402143193544_5056397802817454080_o

Fullscreen capture 20181213 16180147573406_738402169860208_4265581855610241024_o

Fullscreen capture 20181208 194301Fullscreen capture 20181208 194303

47322304_349446355814871_887662456095113216_n

 

View this post on Instagram

#ChrisWatts Crime scene.

A post shared by Nick van der Leek (@nickvdleek) on

View this post on Instagram

#Chriswatts Crime Scene Upstairs.

A post shared by Nick van der Leek (@nickvdleek) on

View this post on Instagram

#ChrisWatts Crime Scene Master Bedroom.

A post shared by Nick van der Leek (@nickvdleek) on

View this post on Instagram

#ChrisWatts Crime Scene Dining Room and Lounge

A post shared by Nick van der Leek (@nickvdleek) on

View this post on Instagram

#ChrisWatts Crime Scene Kitchen

A post shared by Nick van der Leek (@nickvdleek) on

Cadaver dog search – August 14:

Fullscreen capture 20181204 222304Fullscreen capture 20181204 222308Fullscreen capture 20181204 222333Fullscreen capture 20181204 222650Fullscreen capture 20181204 222711Fullscreen capture 20181204 222714-001Fullscreen capture 20181204 222735Fullscreen capture 20181204 223013Fullscreen capture 20181204 223048Fullscreen capture 20181204 223117Fullscreen capture 20181204 223356Fullscreen capture 20181204 223358Fullscreen capture 20181204 223403Fullscreen capture 20181204 223431Fullscreen capture 20181204 223436Fullscreen capture 20181204 223514Fullscreen capture 20181204 225754Fullscreen capture 20181204 223621Fullscreen capture 20181204 224131

The screengrabs below are from video sourced at this link. In the video one has the impression of a chaotic crime scene with the alarm blaring, Deeter barking the cops stumbling and bumbling about, filling in forms on the kitchen counter etc.

Fullscreen capture 20181201 023008Fullscreen capture 20181201 023008-001Fullscreen capture 20181201 023011Fullscreen capture 20181201 023013Fullscreen capture 20181201 023016Fullscreen capture 20181201 023019Fullscreen capture 20181201 023025Fullscreen capture 20181201 023027Fullscreen capture 20181201 023039Fullscreen capture 20181201 023051Fullscreen capture 20181201 023053Fullscreen capture 20181201 023058Fullscreen capture 20181201 023104Fullscreen capture 20181201 023112Fullscreen capture 20181201 023119Fullscreen capture 20181201 023130Fullscreen capture 20181201 023132Fullscreen capture 20181201 023134Fullscreen capture 20181201 023141Fullscreen capture 20181201 023144Fullscreen capture 20181201 023149Fullscreen capture 20181201 023152Fullscreen capture 20181201 023156Fullscreen capture 20181201 023158Fullscreen capture 20181201 023202Fullscreen capture 20181201 023217Fullscreen capture 20181201 023228Fullscreen capture 20181201 023231Fullscreen capture 20181201 023236Fullscreen capture 20181201 023238Fullscreen capture 20181201 023241Fullscreen capture 20181201 023243Fullscreen capture 20181201 023248Fullscreen capture 20181201 023250Fullscreen capture 20181201 023253Fullscreen capture 20181201 023255Fullscreen capture 20181201 023257Fullscreen capture 20181201 023300Fullscreen capture 20181201 023512Fullscreen capture 20181201 023518Fullscreen capture 20181201 023521Fullscreen capture 20181201 023547Fullscreen capture 20181201 023553

More: Excellent Video Footage of the Moment Officer Coonrod Arrives on the Scene at #2825 Saratoga Trail

This last image wasn’t photographed at Saratoga Trail. It’s unclear where the photo was taken. Fullscreen capture 20181130 041605

Nickole Atkinson told the cops to come check on Shan’ann because she had diabetes, as well as lupus

November 22, 2018 / / 20 Comments

The strange thing about knowing more is it often raises more questions. Take this excerpt from page 552 in the Discovery Documents. Nickole Atkinson, when she alerted the cops told them Shan’ann had “known medical conditions” that included diabetes.

31670802_10155400793601935_2682867788351012864_n

Interestingly, Nickole also went the extra mile to actually go to the doctor’s office [apparently in person] to check whether Shan’ann was there. She was told directly that Shan’ann had never showed up. Then she literally tried to get into Shan’ann’s house, not only via the front door but via the garage door. She even had her son looks inside the small square garage windows to see if Shan’ann’s Lexus was inside. And then they were preparing to break down the front door when Chris Watts swooshed in.

Fullscreen capture 20181123 002457

Interestingly, when the cops wanted access to Shan’ann’s phone and banking details, Chris Watts plead ignorance of both. He said [and this is nuts] he had the password for the bank but couldn’t remember the username. When he said he had no clue what Shan’ann’s password was for her phone, Nickole came to the rescue again – and allowed officers to see that there had been zero activity on her phone since she arrived home at 01:48. Incidentally, this further supports the contention that she was murdered IMMEDIATELY upon arriving home.

If they’d argued over any period of time, one can imagine her contacting someone, including her mother and best friends on Facebook.

If Shan’ann did have diabetes, and Nickole seemed pretty clued up on many aspects of Shan’ann’s interior life [including her OCD], then it shows to what extent Shan’ann really wasn’t the picture of physical, mental and marital health she was portraying so exhaustively on Facebook to her Thrive flock.

 

If Shan’ann had been more honest – transparent is the better word – and acknowledged her husband’s unhappiness [rather than the opposite], who knows, she might still be alive today. Chris Watts HAD to have figured that Shan’ann’s online fairy tale about him was, in a real sense, his best and most enduring alibi. And let’s face it, initially it have many of us confused if not fooled altogether1_Chris-Watts-Shanann-Watts

Chris Watts: Here’s what to expect from today’s Sentencing Hearing

November 18, 2018 / / 2 Comments

Whether it’s a British or American court, the format in a sentencing hearing is pretty much stock standard. In broad strokes, the sentencing hearing is really a conversation about aggravating and mitigating factors [and in that order], and whether there are any substantial and compelling factors that cause a court to deviate one way or the other in sentencing. Should the sentence be more severe or should the court use its discretion and be lenient. But there’s more to it than just a tug-of-war between aggravation and mitigation.

Here’s what else to expect from today’s sentencing hearing at 10:00 [some have reported a 10:30 start] in the Weld County Court, in Greeley Colorado.

ArialCourt Complex Map ADDjohn_martinez_pavliga_-_flickr_-_weld_county_courthouseCrystal's Centennial 200 dpi 10x7_5 400

  1. The sentencing hearing has been set for two hours, starting at 10:00 and finishing before 13:00 with possibly a recess halfway through. A press conference will be held afterwards at 13:00 with the Weld County District Attorney’s Office. The proceeding will be held in a larger court than the previous hearings already held in this case. This is in order to accommodate both the defendant’s and the victim’s loved one’s, family and friends, multiple witnesses representing each side as well as the media [who have been permitted expanded media coverage]. It has already been announced that the court proceedings have been moved from division 17 to the larger division 16, and that “overflow” facilities will be made available to extended family, the media the public. Follow the live feed at this link.
  2. images (1)It’s also likely to be held in the newer complex, rather than the old pillared building.
  3. There will be no jury present.
  4. Judge Kopcow will consider the evidence in the case, and hear the prosecutor [Michael Rourke] and his submissions on whether Chris Watts has had any priors. According to his mother he has [or had] a single traffic fine for speeding.
  5. There will also be evidence led on whether Watts was the primary offender in this case, or whether he had an accessory. This is a potential stumbling block if Watts decides to change his mind. His initial version was that the victim was an accessory, though not in the usual sense of the word.
  6. The serious nature of the crime in terms of the respective victims will be outlined. The autopsy evidence may be referenced here to reinforce the injuries and suffering of all three victims, and possibly Niko as well.
  7. In line with this, the prosecutor will specify if there was any unusual cruelty involved in the commission of the various acts. In this respect he may refer to contusions, defensive wounds as well as the heartless disposal of all the remains.
  8. The prosecutor will probably make a case for premeditation. Once again, this may involve referencing specific evidence, and if available, the autopsies my show a significant span of time separating the time of death between one victim and the others. If the autopsy results cannot be relied on in this sense, it’s possible other data might, including evidence such as microscopic human tissue and/or cadaver traces [and odor] left at the scene. Premeditation obviously goes to the calculated, cold-bloodedness of a crime.
  9. The court will consider whether the defendant destroyed evidence, whether he took the court [and/or law enforcement] into his confidence, or whether he attempted to misdirect, mislead or cover-up his crime in some way.
  10. The court will consider whether or not the defendant expressed any genuine remorse.

In the Jodi Arias trial, when Judge K. Stephens announced her judgment on the sentence, Jodi’s mother petitioned on her behalf, and Jodi petitioned at some length for herself.  A lot of baby pictures were presented to curry sympathy, and these were actually on-screen when the Judge pronounced sentence.

Judge Stephens was clear in noting Jodi’s “expressed remorse” which, given the sentence [life without parole] shows the Judge didn’t believe it was genuine or a mitigating factor, whatsoever, especially given the cruelty of the Arias’ act against the victim in that case, Travis Alexander.

In terms of Aggravation:

Expect a lot of emotion in this aspect of the trial. Family members, both parents, and Shan’ann’s brother will make statements about the emotional, financial, psychological and spiritual impact of the murders on each of them personally. Shan’ann’s health issues [lupus, fibromyalgia and her pregnancy] may be raised as an aggravating issue in the sense that her compromised condition made her more vulnerable

There may be an attempt to show Chris Watts’ lack of remorse or honesty toward’s the victim’s family following the crime.

Nickole Atkinson will possibly be called to testify in aggravation, including about Watts’ lack of remorse at the scene. Ditto one or both of the Thayers. However given the time constraint, and thus far no motions have been led indicating they will be testifying, this seems unlikely at the present time.

The fact that Chris Watts accused the victim of committing a crime he committed will be seen as aggravating in the extreme.

It’s probable that Nichole Kessinger will testify in aggravation, bolstering the notion that Watts deceived her and deceived everyone. If Kessinger does testify it’s also possible she will be cross-examined by the defense.

State law enforcement and officials, including the CBI and FBI may be called to testify very briefly about how they were able to nail Watts down as quickly as they did. This may involve dog handlers, the detective-on-scene and possibly the county coroner as well.

Again, given the short nature of the hearing, it’s more likely that only the District Attorney and the aggrieved parents will be called to address the court. 

Rourke-GDT-112214-1

In terms of Mitigation:

Since only two hours have been set down for the proceedings, it’s unlikely the mitigation will go on for much longer than one hour.

Chris Watts appears to have female state appointed defense lawyers. If that remains the case, we’ll see them in action [so to speak] for the first time. If there is a withdrawal of the guilty plea, we could see a motion fielded in court for new defense counsel.

The Judge will consider the health issues – if any, and possibly including any psychological syndromes, disorders or impairments – of the defendant.

The Judge will consider the defendant’s access to support from family and members of the community.

Members of his family will likely step forward and provide character evidence, arguing why the defendant doesn’t “deserve” a particular sentence, or why he does deserve leniency.  This aspect is likely to be emotional and controversial as well. It’s possible one of the Watts clan will raise the specter that Shan’ann was an “abusive” spouse.

The defendant’s childhood background and family history may also be considered.

Given the short nature of the hearing, it’s more likely that Watts’ legal representative and his parents will be the only one’s called to address the court.

The Defendant May Make a Statement

Chris Watts, like Jodi Arias prior to her sentencing, may elect to read a brief statement to the court. It may involve an apology, a demonstration of remorse through words, actions, gestures or commitments. It may also involve a plea for mercy and/or forgiveness.

Scrapping the Plea Deal?

There is also a significant possibility that Chris Watts may elect to withdraw his guilty plea. Although he may or may not do so on November 19th, he could also change his plea during December when the media circus will have shifted gears and moved on.

It seems likely that no matter what happens on the 19th, the case [and the aftermath] is far from over, and far from any kind of satisfactory closure for anyone, including the Rzuceks.

This is why Chris Watts thought he could get away with the annihilation of his family

November 18, 2018 / / 59 Comments

Chris Watts thought he could get away with the annihilation of his family by crafting a story about just one thing.

Spite.

At 06:35 in her interview with 9News, Cindy Watts is asked how she found out about “them being reported missing”.

CINDY [Touching her mouth with two fingers, pressing them against her lips]: I think Ronnie called me. Ronnie called me and said that they’re missing…and, I thought…[swings head] I don’t believe it. 

CINDY: I didn’t believe they were missing. I believe that she…was going to punish Chris. 

Notice Watts’ mother says this in the present tense.

I believe that she…was going to punish Chris. 

So the full psychological equation here, which isn’t elucidated very well right here by Cindy or the reporter, is that Cindy Watts knew over a period of time that her son was leaving Shan’ann, and so within that context, her taking off with the kids made sense to her. Because Shan’ann was a spiteful person, or she was often capable of being spiteful. Spiteful is an ugly, cutting word, so let’s consider it’s permutations:

malicious, mean, nasty, cruel, unkind, unfriendly, snide, hurtful, wounding, barbed, bitter, venomous, vindictive, vengeful, vitriolic, vicious, splenetic, malign, malignant, hateful etc.

So one of those, is what Chris Watts was getting at.

But what was it?

Maybe, according to him, she was just being mean or unkind. Or was she being cruel, or malevolent, or vicious? Of course, whichever one you think Chris Watts is accusing Shan’ann of, is the word we must accuse him for this murders. Was he just unkind or hurtful, or was this barbed, bitter wounding from him the barbed, bitter wounding that would eclipse all barbed and bitter wounding that had gone before?

We must look at the Sermon on the Porch through his psychology, and when we do, we can see why it must have felt good for him to stand in front of his house, and for him to be afforded the chance to speak for Shan’ann for once.

Instead of her always speaking for him, always drowning him out, now he could do what she did to him, he could be her voice. It must have felt good to suggest things about her, knowing the truth was his preserve, and his only, and that through the media, he he had the power to craft any narrative about her.

Whatever he said became her reality, almost like an enchantment. What a turn-around after all the months of MLM madness, all that time of being being pushed, moved and prodded like a pawn through all those meaningless spiels. Well how about this spiel! This was him getting his comeuppance. And not without a little of his own spite peppering proceedings, but carefully hidden behind a friendly manner and an armor of folded arms.

At this point we’re not interested in finding out whether Shan’ann did or didn’t kill the children, what we’re after is the psychological portrait Watts was sketching of her.

What was it?

It was of a vindictive, reactive, spiteful person. He makes a move against her, he tells her he’s leaving her, and then BAM she reacts. She reacts mercilessly, like a scorned tyrant, on her own children. And to Cindy this makes absolute sense. Chris Watts had to have known it would make sense to his mother. It had to be important that the scenario felt right.

In Watts’ affidavit and in his Sermon on the Porch his original version was that he told Shan’ann he wanted to separate and she immediately went into reprisal-mode – punishing him by killing the children.

This scenario of going missing to punish him, his original scenario, also felt right to the Thayers.

In their interview with 9News they also though Shan’ann had taken the girls in a huff after some minor or major disagreement. They thought this because that’s what Chris Watts told them, but it also made sense. It sounded to them like something Shan’ann might do, didn’t it?

NICK: I mean [Amanda chokes up on his shoulder] we really thought [wipes his nose with his forearm]…Monday night when we kind of heard about all this going on [before the Sermon on the Porch] we kinda thought ‘we’ll see her tomorrow. We’re gonna be with the girls tomorrow.’ [Shakes head]. I guess…I haven’t even processed the idea…that our friendship with Chris is no longer.  

Again, Nick Thayer isn’t very specific about it here, but what he’s saying is he was also led to believe – directly, personally – by Chris Watts, that Shan’ann had just taken off with the kids. Maybe she was upset about something and she left so score a point.

Well, she would do that. She did do that, didn’t she?

A few days later they realized they’d been duped, betrayed, but they were duped because the lie fell on fertile soil. The scenario Watts was sketching made sense because they knew Shan’ann.

If we watch his Sermon on the Porch again, his demeanor is based on a scenario where him and Shan’ann had had a simple argument, he cares about her and the kids is how he’s presenting himself, but he’s no longer in a committed relationship, and she knows that, and that’s why she’s left.

Interestingly, he makes an “anonymous friend” the reason why she’s missing, a mirror on his own anonymous friend, and a mirror on his own knowledge about how and why this friend [potentially] is the “reason” they’ve gone missing.

In the first minute of that interview, when the reporter asks what happened – a wonderfully open-ended question – Watts sketches it as Shan’ann comes home [no big deal], he goes to work [no big deal] and then he gets a call from one her friends [is it a big deal?] and he returns from work, and he’s the last to know what’s going on [what’s the deal?]. Where’s Shan’ann? Where are the kids? He has no idea. Maybe she left. Maybe someone came and took them [according to an arrangement she made, and a subtle up-yours to him through that, leaving him in the lurch]. And if she doesn’t get back to him that’s fine [because stuff is going on between them], but if she’s not getting back to her people [he’s not her people], well that’s a concern.

All of that within the first minute. It’s a clever ruse except the part that he’s revealing is that it’s only important to worry about Shan’ann because everyone else is.

WATTS [Tongue flick, lowers head]: Uh, she came home from the airport, 2am, and I left around 5:15 [glances up] , she was still here [a lie, she was dead]…and…like…about 12:10…and that afternoon a friend Nickole showed up at the door [nods to the front door] , like I had texted Shan’ann a few times that day, called her, say, you know, but she never got back [slight asymmetric curling of the lip] to me. But she never got back to any of her people as well. And that’s what…really concerned a lot of people. Like, if she doesn’t, like if she doesn’t get back to me [shrugs] that’s fine, she gets busy during the day, but she diodn’t get back with her people which was very concerning. And Nickole called me when she was at the door [opens folded arm and motions to the door] and that’s when I came home. [Dogs barking in background]. And then walked in the house and [looks sidelong into the house] nothing [a slight smile and curl of the lip here too. He’s pleased with his handiwork]. Just vanished. Nothing was here. I mean she wasn’t-wasn’t here. The kids weren’t here. No-nobody was here.

In this version, Chris Watts is leading his audience into a scenario where he goes to work, is summoned home and his wife and kids are gone. Just vanished. He called her, she never got back to him or anyone else. He’s shifting the buck to her. He wants his mother and the Thayers and those close to him to think not what has he done, but what has Shan’ann gone and done?

When I first came to this case, I wondered why there is this extraordinary degree of sadism involved. There’s not just the killing of a woman, but a pregnant woman. Not just the killing of one daughter, but two. Not just the killing of these four flesh-and-blood beings but the unholy dumping of their bodies in oil and dust. There’s sadism – and shame – there too. The psychological mirror for sadism is humiliation. In some way, Chris Watts felt intensely humiliated over a long period of time. The narrative that so many are opposed to [understandably at this stage], that there was a spiteful aspect to Shan’ann’s personality, awakens the possibility that this was the root of his sadism.

It doesn’t make it right or reasonably, but it may go towards explaining why, not so?

And there’s an added reason why so little of the Sermon of the Porch made little sense, and stretched Chris Watts’ credibility to breaking point. There was one word he didn’t mention during the interview. This is a question for those who haven’t read any of the TWO FACE books. What word should have been the first word to use during the interview, and it’s a word he simply never mentions once. I’ll deal with that in a separate post, but you can start pondering on this so long.

“Time for a Reset” + Shan’ann repeatedly pronounces her name on video… – New Orleans, April 27, 2018

November 9, 2018 / / 2 Comments

New Orleans was where Shan’ann was celebrated for her “time for a reset” article, published in Thrive’s Strive magazine. Nick Thayer had taken the photos for the article.

This is them on the way to or back from that shoot:

The first few seconds of the video below, Shan’ann repeatedly pronounces her name to the guy holding the microphone.

Below: Nickole Atkinson test-drives a Tesla Model-X worth about $80 000.

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2024 TRUE CRIME ROCKET SCIENCE

Theme by Anders Noren — Up ↑